8. SECTION 8 – ACADEMIC INTEGRITY & CONDUCT

8.1 Purpose

Academic and spiritual integrity form the foundation of learning at Everlight Ministry of Theology (EMT).
Because theological education is both intellectual and sacred, dishonesty in scholarship is viewed as a violation not merely of institutional policy but of Christian discipleship.

Every student is therefore expected to conduct academic work with honesty, humility, diligence, and reverence for truth—reflecting the character of Christ in all scholarly pursuits.

“Whatever you do, work at it with all your heart, as working for the Lord…” — Colossians 3:23

8.2 Commitment to Integrity

By enrolling at EMT, students affirm that they will:

  • Produce and submit original work for every course or assessment.
  • Cite all sources appropriately according to APA 7th Edition or Turabian standards.
  • Use approved plagiarism-checking tools (e.g., Scribbr or PapersOwl) before submission.
  • Avoid unauthorized collaboration, contract writing, or AI-generated work not disclosed per academic policy.
  • Maintain a minimum cumulative GPA of 3.0 (B) as evidence of sustained effort and academic excellence.

Integrity is not optional—it is integral to the witness and mission of the Institute.

8.3 Definition of Academic Misconduct

Academic misconduct includes but is not limited to the following:

  1. Plagiarism – Presenting another person’s words or ideas as one’s own, whether copied, paraphrased, or AI-generated without citation.
  2. Fabrication – Inventing data, sources, or references in assignments or research.
  3. Collusion – Unauthorized collaboration or submission of shared work as individual effort.
  4. Unauthorized Assistance – Using generative tools or editing services beyond allowed limits.
  5. Duplicate Submission – Reusing prior work without faculty approval.
  6. Cheating – Any deceitful act intended to gain academic advantage.

8.4 Procedures for Academic Integrity Violations

When an integrity concern arises:

  1. Initial Review – The instructor evaluates the concern and may request supporting documentation (plagiarism report, references, or drafts).
  2. Notification – The student receives written notice and an opportunity to respond.
  3. Administrative Review – The Academic Dean reviews evidence, determines severity, and renders a decision.
  4. Sanctions may include:
    • Formal written warning
    • Requirement to redo or replace the assignment
    • Grade reduction or “Fail” for the course
    • Probation or suspension for repeated offenses

Severe or unrepentant misconduct may result in dismissal.

8.5 Academic Probation and Integrity

Students whose cumulative GPA drops below 3.0 or who violate academic honesty policies may be placed on Academic Probation.
During probation:

  • The student meets with an academic mentor or advisor.
  • A written restoration plan outlines expectations and resources.
  • Probation is lifted once GPA ≥ 3.0 and integrity standards are re-established.

Failure to meet conditions may lead to suspension or dismissal.

8.6 Spiritual and Ethical Conduct

Because EMT integrates faith and learning, ethical behavior is inseparable from academic conduct. Students are expected to:

  • Model Christ-like humility, respect, and love toward peers and faculty.
  • Uphold biblical morality and integrity in communication.
  • Use language that honors the Lord in all online forums or discussion boards.
  • Refrain from harassment, divisiveness, or disrespectful debate.
  • Represent EMT faithfully in public and ministry contexts.

Faculty and staff likewise commit to the same spiritual and ethical standards.

8.7 Use of Technology and AI Tools

EMT recognizes the educational value of emerging technologies when used ethically.

Permitted Use

  • Grammar or citation aids such as Grammarly or QuillBot, when disclosed.
  • Bible software, research databases, or approved theological libraries.

Prohibited Use

  • Submitting AI-generated essays or content as original work.
  • Using translation or paraphrase software to mask plagiarism.
  • Manipulating AI to fabricate theological or academic sources.

All use of technology must serve, not replace, critical thought and authentic scholarship.

8.8 Reporting Integrity Concerns

Any faculty member, student, or administrator may confidentially report suspected academic misconduct to the Academic Dean.
The process is restorative: the goal is to teach integrity and accountability, not to shame.

Students proven innocent will have the report expunged from records; confirmed violations will be documented in the Registrar’s confidential file.

8.9 Restoration and Grace

EMT affirms that repentance and restoration are central to Christian community.
Students who acknowledge wrongdoing, seek forgiveness, and demonstrate genuine change may be reinstated to full standing after completing assigned corrective measures.

“If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us…” — 1 John 1:9

8.10 Appeals Process

Students may appeal disciplinary decisions by submitting a written appeal within 10 days of notification.
The appeal should include:

  • A clear statement of the decision being appealed.
  • Grounds for appeal (procedural error, new evidence, or dis-proportionality).

The Academic Dean, in consultation with the President, will render a final decision within 14 days.
All decisions are prayerfully reviewed and documented for institutional integrity.

8.11 Academic Recognition for Integrity

Students who demonstrate consistent honesty, diligence, and excellence (GPA ≥ 3.75 and no conduct violations) may be nominated for:

  • The EMT Honor in Academic Integrity Award
  • Recognition at commencement and in alumni publications

8.12 Summary Statement

Integrity is the light that guides learning at EMT.
Our goal is not only to produce scholars but to form servants of truth—believers whose intellect and character bear witness to Christ.
“The integrity of the upright guides them…” — Proverbs 11:3